|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Jonno
Location: Auckland
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:59 pm Missile Combat Rules |
|
|
I was wandering if a javelin made with a bamboo stake, foam (from an old foam mattress) rapped inside a piece of material and secured with tape would be aloud on the field in light missile combat.
The bamboo stake would be in the middle of the foam.
Cheers Jonno |
|
|
|
NigelT
Site Admin
Location: Wellington
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 10:54 am |
|
|
Hi Jonno,
Purely from what you've told me I would say yes that is fine. However we'll have to take a final look at weapons check anyway. Javelins are a bit more forgiving than arrows because they have inherently less power and therefore are not subject to the same rigourous requirements as arrows.
With javelins what we're looking for is that they are not too heavy and they have enough padding on the end to prevent punch-through and make them safe. They don't have to be wrapped and there is no set length as long as they're not longer than 1.6m.
If you're in any doubt, post a photo, but you're probably on the money I would say.
Nigel |
|
|
|
Inigo
Location: Auckland
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 1:14 pm |
|
|
Stuart, this reply is a bit late because I haven't been around here for a while. I think you've missed the fundamental point of what SCA combat is about.
Combat done by most reenactors looks nice but it's difficult for the reenactors to be as competitive or aggressive as SCA combat because the primary focus is on not hurting anyone. Rather than wrapping everyone in cotton wool like the SCA does, compromises are made to the techniques you can use so that equipment looks appropriate and people aren't hurt. Generally, if a compromise has to be made, reenactors will tend to try and get their kit looking correct and restrict technique rather than the other way around.
On the other hand, if you look at SCA combat, the focus is on feeling like you are actually fighting, with the main restrictions on technique being decided by people many years ago, based on what techniques were "chivalrous"*. The primary focus when you're fighting is using your very ugly rattan stick like it's actually a weapon. Sure, we have more restrictions than some of the WMA would like, but it works for mass combat where you may have a huge disparity in size and skill.
So, given the choice between:
A) wearing pretty helmets and using pretty weapons and not being able to smash each other in the head
-- or --
B) wearing ugly helmets and using ugly weapons and being able to smash each other in the head
NAAMA chose A and the SCA chose B.
The SCA in Australia and New Zealand use the rules (that were copied from a steel weapon group) because they "feel like fighting". Sure, you have to wear ugly mesh, but we already have ugly helmets, so that's not important.
It's similar to the choice we made above, except you can:
A) wear pretty helmets and only allow lofted volley fire which looks good but is ineffective
-- or --
B) wear ugly helmets and allow archers to treat their bow as a weapon, not just a way to entertain an audience
Again, the SCA picked B. (NAAMA is currently looking at doing A and B)
I really enjoy combat archery in the SCA. It's nice to storm a fort and have arrows disintegrating on the front of the shield wall and seeing the guys beside you die from an arrow in the throat shot by a guy less than 10m away. It FEELS like war even if it the helmets look ugly. Arched volley fire is fun - I'm not knocking it. But direct fire where the archers are sniping the helmets of the pikemen behind the shield wall is MORE fun. Sprinting at archers who are trying to kill you with direct fire is also lots of fun, for both people.
The NAAMA camp is more about entertaining the participants than trying to reenact a specific battle, entertain an audience or make a movie. The new archery rules allow for two grades of archers; the first is probably more like what you are used to and the second is more like what I'm used to.
One other point I'll mention, while I'm on my soap box; I'm glad that the NAAMA rules are compatible with the SCA rules because of a very good reason. The pool of potential combat archers in New Zealand is small. It would be the height of stupidity to create a new system that was substantially different one that already works. As these rules stand, any SCA combat archer in New Zealand could walk out onto the NAAMA battlefield and participate. More than half the SCA fighters in New Zealand are able to fight as archers and this is likely to be a larger pool of ready to fight archers than any other group can muster. Many of this pool of people can't currently fight at NAAMA because they don't train with steel weapons. Offering them a familiar option is good!
* it's bollocks of course as we all know the chivalry were as happy as the next man to wrestle a man to the ground and stick a poinard in his armpit. _________________ A book may be able to teach you something of fighting, but it can't cover your back when the shield wall breaks up! |
|
|
|
Stuart
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 1:50 pm |
|
|
As my old martial arts instructor used to say: No art is better than any other, they are only different..
BTW, Linseed oil on the arrows, and they don`t break. I am taking the bow and flus down to Five Oaks this weekend. I am encouraging everyone to have a shoot. _________________ A Dane Axe beats two aces anytime. |
|
|
|
NigelT
Site Admin
Location: Wellington
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:43 pm |
|
|
Inigo wrote: | I'm glad that the NAAMA rules are compatible with the SCA rules |
Hi Inigo,
The only difference (apart from potential minor differences in how we run fights) is the fact that we (NAAMA) are requiring flu-flu or modified flu-flu fletching and not speed blunts. This could change in future if the majority wants it so, but for now anyway, anyone from the SCA would simply have to ensure their arrows had the right fletching and they could walk onto the battlefield and fight as light or heavy missile combatants without no other change to their kit.
I'm not sure if it means NAAMA heavy missile combatants could walk onto an SCA field the same way - that would be something for an SCA person to comment on. There might be additional kit requirements for the SCA...?
By all means encourage anyone from the SCA to come along to NAAMA this year, even for the day, and help shoot people
Nigel |
|
|
|
stephan
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:35 am |
|
|
hey nigel
i have just been given a bow
i am all for authenticty and all but this bow is is made of plastic and bright red it looks like a bow should but is not made of the right stuff it was a present to me and i intend to use it before i replace it with a wood one, its ok if i am not allowed on the feild with it due to it being red and plastic
i would never take it on a public event but between us at a private one would this be allowed as i relly want to shoot at people but cant afford a new one in time
from five feet away it looks like a painted wood one
i will not take it personnaly if the answer is no
regards stephan |
|
|
|
Stuart
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:40 am |
|
|
Sound like a fibreglass bow. You might want to take some thin leather, soak it, and stitch it around the bow. At least that disguises the 20 century materials. Hope that is helpful. _________________ A Dane Axe beats two aces anytime. |
|
|
|
NigelT
Site Admin
Location: Wellington
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:56 am |
|
|
stephan wrote: | its ok if i am not allowed on the feild with it due to it being red and plastic |
Hi Stephan, my job is to make sure it's safe. I really don't care what it looks like as long as it's not a compound bow, which it's not. If you want to paint neon zebra stripes on it I'll still let you on the field.
Nigel |
|
|
|
Grayson
Location: Croydon,Victoria Australia/ Wellington,NZ
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 5:38 pm |
|
|
Neon zebra stripes hmmm.... wonder if I'd be allowed to paint our new bows....Probably not. _________________ Do not scorn a weak cub. He may become a brutal tiger |
|
|
|
stephan
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 1:39 pm |
|
|
awesome will see about covering it up
wow its really begining to ail right now the ground is turning white |
|
|
|
VĂkarr
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:14 pm |
|
|
stephan wrote: | i would never take it on a public event but between us at a private one would this be allowed as i relly want to shoot at people but cant afford a new one in time
|
Rather than leather you could bind/glue some light cheap material such as calico around the bow. This would save you a bit on cost and probably take the shape of the bow easier. You could then stain the material.
V. |
|
|
|
Black Jack
Location: West Auckland
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 10:00 am heavy missile combat rules |
|
|
Hi Nigel . I'm on the periphery of the reinactment scene, having being introduced to it by the Dark Company here in Orcland, my area of experience being field archery. May I make a suggestion to the bow draw weight rule? As you know, not everyone has a 28" draw. Although all mass production bows are classified in this way, a custom bow will be built to pull a specified weight at a specified draw length. For instance, my usual, comfortable draw length is 24 1/2 inches.( not only because I'm vertically challenged, but because of the style I've adopted).
If I was to draw a 30# bow to this length, I'd be lucky to be drawing 20# (depending on the type and efficiency of the bow ). I would therefore be seriously diadvantaged , especially shooting slow. heavy blunt tipped flu-flu arrows.
An alternative rule would be that the bow must pull no more than 30# at the archer's draw length. This could be easily checked using a spring scale and a marked arrow, and you're going to have to check everyone's bows anyway, as not all bows will come with the poundage scribed on them. What do you think? |
|
|
|
Black Jack
Location: West Auckland
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 10:33 am heavy missile combat rules |
|
|
Hi Nigel . I'm on the periphery of the reinactment scene, having being introduced to it by the Dark Company here in Orcland, my area of experience being field archery. May I make a suggestion to the bow draw weight rule? As you know, not everyone has a 28" draw. Although all mass production bows are classified in this way, a custom bow will be built to pull a specified weight at a specified draw length. For instance, my usual, comfortable draw length is 24 1/2 inches.( not only because I'm vertically challenged, but because of the style I've adopted).
If I was to draw a 30# bow to this length, I'd be lucky to be drawing 20# (depending on the type and efficiency of the bow ). I would therefore be seriously diadvantaged , especially shooting slow. heavy blunt tipped flu-flu arrows.
An alternative rule would be that the bow must pull no more than 30# at the archer's draw length. This could be easily checked using a spring scale and a marked arrow, and you're going to have to check everyone's bows anyway, as not all bows will come with the poundage scribed on them. What do you think? |
|
|
|
Chevalier
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:07 pm |
|
|
Quote: | I'm not sure if it means NAAMA heavy missile combatants could walk onto an SCA field the same way - that would be something for an SCA person to comment on. There might be additional kit requirements for the SCA...? |
Yepp, there are additional kit requirements, eg kidney belt (see the link to the SCA fighter's manual that I posted before)! |
|
|
|
Inigo
Location: Auckland
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 10:22 pm Re: heavy missile combat rules |
|
|
Black Jack wrote: | ...An alternative rule would be that the bow must pull no more than 30# at the archer's draw length... |
While I can sympathise with your dilemma, I believe that a weapon should be legal or illegal. Frequently, a battle will involve people borrowing weapons off each other and it is (to my mind) better that a weapon is legal for general use, not just for an individual.
If you feel you are disadvantaged by short arms, consider a crossbow! _________________ A book may be able to teach you something of fighting, but it can't cover your back when the shield wall breaks up! |
|
|
|
|
|