|
Author |
Message |
knight of magdalene
This account is inactive
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:09 am harness designed for safty |
|
|
what elements should be included into paticipants kit to ensure safty? _________________ Servo Insons Insontis |
|
|
|
Oskar der Drachen
Location: Masterton
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:44 pm |
|
|
Rigid protection for:
Joints, to include from the bottom..
Ankles, knees, wrists, elbows, shoulders
Squidgy bits from the bottom to include..
Groin, kidneys, breasts (if you have them), throat (all the way round)
Head & Face (mouthguard at minimum, and no chaffing at participant if a face guard is added to an open face helm if desired).
This stuff does not have to be onerous or heavy, especially if the rules for blows in NAAMA are as I have heard. What you are protecting against is
"OOOOPS!!" Everyone has an Oops now and again, and there's no trying to blame someone afterwards for an honest accident, slippery grass or a tussock happens. You are limiting Oooops damage with equipment minimums, nothing more need be implied. |
|
|
|
knight of magdalene
This account is inactive
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:51 pm |
|
|
what is the current design of such,
ie what modern products are available that can be hidden?
has any one of the like of colin or other such as our armourours designed such that can be put in place and hidden using modern composites etc
what has been developed to this time? _________________ Servo Insons Insontis |
|
|
|
Colin
Location: Wellington
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:05 am |
|
|
My attempts for making safety gear are aimed at WMA, not re-enactment.
That's not to say I won't sell such safety gear for re-enactors, but it won't be historical. It will be modern, and with WMA in mind. This means they are designed for taking all blows; be it a thrust to the throat or face, or horizontal attacks to the head.
My intention is for them to be mass produced. I may as a service be willing to weld a fencing visor (mesh) onto re-enactor helmets, but I'm unsure on whether that is a general desirability in this community. I could look at solid joint protection, but the padded garment I've got in mind should provide excellent protection. _________________ The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
See http://www.swordsmanship.co.nz/ |
|
|
|
knight of magdalene
This account is inactive
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:24 am |
|
|
would it not be possible for the safty technology to be designed in such a way as to be able to be hidden? or in a way that is acceptable?
This proposal is based around the concept that NAAMA is not in fact
Quote: | designed to let the lowest common denominator fight, one would presume, safely.
|
But the early stages of a national association where interclub ( interstyle) practitioner participation happens.
What reason would there be to resist implementing high end safty measures? None that I can think of...can any one else think of any reason why not?
I propose we run a national design competition for this ...
your thoughts? _________________ Servo Insons Insontis |
|
|
|
knight of magdalene
This account is inactive
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:28 am |
|
|
What reluctance are you finding? _________________ Servo Insons Insontis |
|
|
|
knight of magdalene
This account is inactive
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:28 am |
|
|
what reluctance is there for this equipment? _________________ Servo Insons Insontis |
|
|
|
Angel
Site Admin
Location: Wellington
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:39 am |
|
|
Cost. Money doesn't grow on trees. Neither does armour. _________________ Recognise anyone? Flame Warriors |
|
|
|
knight of magdalene
This account is inactive
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:12 am |
|
|
Is cost the only reason?
If so then the solution will be easily implimented.
We dont know what that cost might be as yet...
why not look at the designs and go from there?
can every one please post their thoughts on what would be required to protect the key areas. or expand on this list.
top of head ( crushing impact)
face ( glancing and thrusting blows) with full protection provided to eyes, nose mouth ear channels temple
Neck ( windpipe, neck spine)
Sholders ( collar bone )
Chest
Inner arm ( artery protection)
Outer arm ( crushing)
Elbows, (crushing, Twisting limitation)
hands ( crushing)
Groin ( peircing, crushing)
Full length of spine - including tailbone ( crushing)
rear of legs ( artery protection)
front of legs ( crushing)
Knees ( crushing, twisting, sideways collapsing limitation)
Feet ( crushing ) _________________ Servo Insons Insontis |
|
|
|
Angel
Site Admin
Location: Wellington
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:14 pm |
|
|
Okay, not in any way suggesting this as minimums for NAAMA, but offering reasonalble solutions for protecting various bits. Many of these solutions aren't authentic for some the periods that people choose to recreate.
Head - A steel helmet constructed out of 2mm steel for structural integrity and to provide mass. The heavier your helmet is, the less impact gets transferred to your head. The helmet needs to be sufficiently padded - a beany just doesn't provide enough padding. Hemlet could extend to cover ears, cheeks etc.
Face - A face plate. This could possibly be disguised with a mail drape etc to be more appropriate.
Neck - SCA legal leather gorget does the trick for me, protects wind pipe and the cervical vertebrae. I also have a camaille attached to my helmet.
Shoulders - sufficient padding (gambeson) and/or spaulders or whatever term is appropriate.
Chest - at least some padding. I'd recommend something more substantial (ie barbie boobs or a breastplate) for women, because getting stabbed in the tit REALLY frickin' hurts.
Inner arm - puncture resistant clothing - a few of layers of drill fabric or a gambeson will do the trick.
Outer arm - again, a padded gambeson, rigid upper arm protection if you are feeling keen.
Elbows - rigid protection with padding - even skateboard pads under your tunic would be better than nothing. Not sure what to do about torsional injuries, other than training to avoid them.
hands and wrists - rigid protection with padding - could be steel, could be leather - if it's bendy and bony, protect it!
Groin - martial arts groin protection all the way. To protect the arteries again wear puncture resistant fabric - pants!
Spine - protect the sticky-outy ones up by the neck with extra, but just cover the rest with at least a padded gambeson.
Rear of legs - puncture resistant pants
Front of legs - padding for thighs, rigid knee protection, and rigid protection for bony shins. Not sure what to do to prevent torsional injuries - having good knee armour which extends above and below the knee to reinforce may help.
Feet and ankles - decent boots, sabotons if appropriate. _________________ Recognise anyone? Flame Warriors |
|
|
|
knight of magdalene
This account is inactive
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:52 pm |
|
|
Why wouldnt there ba a minimum NAAMA safty standard for inter style participation? I am lost here as to what the opposition to that might be.. other than cost and thats easily sorted if the participant can make their own addapting modern product following patterns freely provided.
For example the helm needs to be suspended from the skull via suspension, this can be acheived for example by inserting a modern safty helmet inside the outer , the chin strap should be as per modern military helms ie the chin protrudes through the strap and other such adaptions.
The spine and sholders can be protected with adapted motorcross kit...followed by gambison followed by whatever else...
what designs are out there for all this? _________________ Servo Insons Insontis |
|
|
|
knight of magdalene
This account is inactive
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:58 pm |
|
|
Quote: | Okay, not in any way suggesting this as minimums for NAAMA, but offering reasonalble solutions for protecting various bits. Many of these solutions aren't authentic for some the periods that people choose to recreate. |
The point i am making is that due to oxydation history is to a degree open to flexability. Obviously machine made is not correct and materials would be different but I know that instinct has not changed. If you are preparing to fight to survive by putting on bits, you would adapt...protection. and our brains arnt that much different form our ancestors...so if you can look at pile of materials, that were available within your historical reference you could easily fashion a minimum NAAMA standard from that.
Am I wrong? _________________ Servo Insons Insontis |
|
|
|
Angel
Site Admin
Location: Wellington
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:20 pm |
|
|
It would probably be possible to fashion a close approximation of a WWII tank from materials and techniques available in the medieval period. That'll keep me safe on the field. Protects all those important bits. Doesn't mean I want to use it, though.
If it were all about safety we'd be using Nerf products. _________________ Recognise anyone? Flame Warriors |
|
|
|
Angel
Site Admin
Location: Wellington
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:42 pm |
|
|
knight of magdalene wrote: | Why wouldnt there ba a minimum NAAMA safty standard for inter style participation? |
To get "inter-stye" you effectively end up with a new style.
If your new style is more physical than what the minimalists want, then they won't play. If it's less than what the heavy-armour hard-hitters want, then they possibly aren't going to play either, because that's not the game they are after.
What level of contact are you envisioning for your inter-style style? The level of contact pretty much gives us the level of risk to mitigate with safety equipment. _________________ Recognise anyone? Flame Warriors |
|
|
|
knight of magdalene
This account is inactive
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 3:31 pm |
|
|
Dunno ...what do you think the vairous factions would find minimally acceptable? _________________ Servo Insons Insontis |
|
|
|
|