|
Author |
Message |
Robbo
Location: In the Tree's
|
Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 10:53 pm |
|
|
Robbo & Peewee Detective Agency:
Refer to image WaikatoWSO_6175_cr.jpg by Errol.
Not that I'm keen to say anything negative about anyone...the Norse chap with his back to the camera, chain, teardrop helm. That's a rather large axe to be using single handed....it also looks like the beard has some rather pointy bits.
Care to wager there's the problem?
Too heavy for one hand, tad pointy on the beard's hook. _________________ Hail the Sky Traveller |
|
|
|
huscarl
Location: in the back of your mind
|
Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 11:12 pm |
|
|
happy to say negative stuff.
ref image WaikatoWSO_6175_cr.jpg by Errol.
this nice chap has a nice long / med axe in one hand (looks like he is bilt like king kong) plus if you lok at some of the other shots of this nice young man he also fights with his eyes closed (like me in wombles helm)
not to knock the fighter but id like to get a closer look at that axe.
at the end of the day ref my earler post (Axes heads be nice) _________________ hail Fraja. |
|
|
|
ChronicD
Sponsor
Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm Mouth Gards as a mandatory requirement |
|
|
I am quite happy to find a post that trys to deal with this.
I am not sure how many people have lost teeth while fighting, but i can account for one - myself.
Basically was fighting with spear, was rushed and then acciedentily was hit in the face by the cross gard/mit/lower edge of the sword. I bit through my lower lip and to this day have a lump in the middle of it (like a hard pea) i also had my right top incisor cut in half diagonally which had to be crowned. It ended up costing about 700 bux after acc to pay for the crown and that is with an estimated life span of 10 years. meaning that it will have to be replaced every ten years till my teeth fall out at old age. so say that will be when i am 90, it happened at 20 so that is 7 decades = 4,900 bux. well i can think of alot of medieval kit i could buy with that!!! all of this could have been avoided for a 20 dollar mouth guard.
Though i have to say i hate wearing them and actually dont when i go to club training (now a while ago but after that always wore one at camps when things are just a bit more edgy. Even when i was wearing a full face!!! though whether that is necessary is debatable.
So i suppose what i am saying is that i strongly believe at camps that open face helmet users should use gum guards as a mandatory requirement - anyone else using full face can decide for themselves. (I will avoid saying... "bugger it".... FULL FACE SHOULD BE MANDATORY!!!!)
Well i suppose it is obvious where i stand on the subject, as for "mad axe harry" - please be more care full and use a smaller weapon if you want to fight like that.
later
dan _________________ The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous. |
|
|
|
BigMac
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 4:33 am |
|
|
I approve of anything done to improve safety as long as it actually improves the safety of the sport and is not just a kneejerk reaction that glosses over the true problem.
A mouth guard would not have prevented either of the blows I've lost teeth to. Also like Robbo I face problems using a mouth gaurd and still being able to use an inhailor or even breath properly.
My understanding is that mouth gaurds prevent damage to the brain by absorbing impact that would otherwise slam the brain into the skull ie the uppercut, not sure if the reverse is true, but it certainly wouldn't prevent compression of the cervical vertibrae which is the other danger from overstrengthed crowning shots.
That people are coming away injured from Head blow is unacceptable no matter the stimuli and is indicative IMO of poor training, technique and control.
However before condeeming people or practices at the event and in the movement has anyone looked into wheather noise could be a factor, could the use of earplugs be more benificial to stop these headaches?
Perfect practice stops injuries
TTFN _________________ There is a fine line between Hobby and Insanity |
|
|
|
Fungus
Location: Taranaki
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 10:00 am er |
|
|
Er earplugs would be bad as no one would hear stop....... _________________ We dont play tiddly winks
Twizel shall fall |
|
|
|
PopTart
Location: Tauranga
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 11:07 am |
|
|
Yeah, I can just see the marshal running onto the field with a big banner painted with the words: STOP YA BUGGERS!
Either that or trying to use sign language to get our attention.
Dance, Fungus, dance...
Ear plugs? nah.
Willz |
|
|
|
Paddy
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 1:12 pm |
|
|
mabey it requires wider training and scrutiny from clubs that do train in head blow, more attention should be focused on those doing the damage than the gear that obviously would stand up to a CONTROLLED WELL FORMED blow. My ittle 1.6mm bacinet has stood up to some savage blows and the only padding ive had is sheep skin, so it is not the gear its control and training that makes our beloved sport safer. _________________ Here Lies Paddy |
|
|
|
Thys
Location: Orc Land
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 2:20 pm |
|
|
I would suggest that clubs at the least recommend their fighters use mouth guards. Actual use comes down to the fighter (There may be a good reason as to why they chose not to) but imo its far better to be safe than sorry. _________________ Man Mountain |
|
|
|
Brithem Rig
Location: Ward 31
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 10:50 pm |
|
|
Having lost several teeth to a single head blow I can understand the need for protection but for some working with a mouthguard is impossible. Helms need to be at least 2mm throughout, 2mm spun bowls will be thinner on the crown, padding is highly recommended to reduce concussions and I would recommend to anyone doing headblow to wear a mouthguard, but ultimitely the responsibility is on the person delivering the blow and that requires more training on their part.
I still wear the same helm and trust in those that are hitting me in the head to do it properly i.e. a crowning shot that is controlled. |
|
|
|
Robbo
Location: In the Tree's
|
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 11:44 pm |
|
|
Interesting the amount of people who have lost teeth to this neh?
...and some people wonder why I go ballistic every time I see someone thinking they can use 2 x swords effectively/safely. _________________ Hail the Sky Traveller |
|
|
|
conal
Site Admin
|
Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:11 pm |
|
|
http://www.sportsdentistry.com/concussion.html
I think the main benefit in terms of concussion prevention is in floating the lower jaw and the impact absorbance gained from it, from blows to the head.
Any blow to the head. From any angle.
Have a look at the Barnes Wallis bouncing bomb. |
|
|
|
Ben
Location: Auckland
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:35 pm |
|
|
An interesting read, although I was a little disappointed - my 5 min google search yielded more info. The sites I found varied in which types of impact was protected against, and the only thing that they all have in common (this one included) is that the protection against concussion is an unproven theory.
Their ability to protect against damage to teeth however, is well proven, making them a good idea if you fight in an open faced helm.
Ultimately the only way to effectively prevent concussions in head blow combat is control - something all combatants are supposed to have... |
|
|
|
Robbo
Location: In the Tree's
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:59 pm |
|
|
yeah...but no one's proven relativity either. _________________ Hail the Sky Traveller |
|
|
|
Gaius Drustanus
This account is inactive
Location: auckland
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:24 am |
|
|
yeah .......... Einstein did! _________________ Disclaimer:Opinions expressed by Warlord Drustan, this debauched demented megalomaniac are solely his own & do not reflect those of LegioIIAugusta or the Roman people in any way. |
|
|
|
Chevalier
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 12:15 pm |
|
|
Quote: | the protection against concussion is an unproven theory |
Unfortunately that seems to be the fact having read medical research papers on this. However, as stated above, teeth can be protected... |
|
|
|
|